NVIDIANeMo Curator
Menu

Deduplication

Remove duplicate and near-duplicate documents from text datasets using NeMo Curator’s GPU-accelerated deduplication workflows. Removing duplicates prevents overrepresentation of repeated content in language model training.

NeMo Curator provides three deduplication approaches: exact matching (MD5 hashing), fuzzy matching (MinHash + LSH), and semantic matching (embeddings). All methods are GPU-accelerated and integrate with the data processing pipeline .

How It Works

NeMo Curator provides three deduplication approaches, each optimized for different duplicate types:

Exact

Method: MD5 hashing Detects: Character-for-character identical documents Speed: Fastest

Computes MD5 hashes for each document’s text content and groups documents with identical hashes. Best for removing exact copies.

Code Example
from nemo_curator.core.client import RayClient
from nemo_curator.stages.deduplication.exact.workflow import ExactDeduplicationWorkflow

ray_client = RayClient()
ray_client.start()

exact_workflow = ExactDeduplicationWorkflow(
    input_path="/path/to/input/data",
    output_path="/path/to/output",
    text_field="text",
    perform_removal=False,  # Identification only
    assign_id=True,
    input_filetype="parquet"
)
result = exact_workflow.run()
# result.metadata contains: total_time, num_duplicates, identification_time, id_generator_path

For removal, use TextDuplicatesRemovalWorkflow with the generated duplicate IDs. See Exact Duplicate Removal for details.

Fuzzy

Method: MinHash + Locality Sensitive Hashing (LSH) Detects: Near-duplicates with minor edits (~80% similarity) Speed: Fast

Generates MinHash signatures and uses LSH to find similar documents. Best for detecting documents with small formatting differences or typos.

Code Example
from nemo_curator.core.client import RayClient
from nemo_curator.stages.deduplication.fuzzy.workflow import FuzzyDeduplicationWorkflow

ray_client = RayClient()
ray_client.start()

fuzzy_workflow = FuzzyDeduplicationWorkflow(
    input_path="/path/to/input/data",
    cache_path="/path/to/cache",
    output_path="/path/to/output",
    text_field="text",
    perform_removal=False,  # Identification only
    input_blocksize="1GiB",
    seed=42,
    char_ngrams=24,
    num_bands=20,
    minhashes_per_band=13
)
result = fuzzy_workflow.run()
# result.metadata contains: total_time, num_duplicates, minhash_time, lsh_time, connected_components_pipeline_time, id_generator_path

For removal, use TextDuplicatesRemovalWorkflow with the generated duplicate IDs. See Fuzzy Duplicate Removal for details.

Semantic

Method: Embeddings + clustering + pairwise similarity Detects: Semantically similar content (paraphrases, translations) Speed: Moderate

Generates embeddings using transformer models, clusters them, and computes pairwise similarities. Best for meaning-based deduplication.

Code Example
from nemo_curator.stages.text.deduplication.semantic import TextSemanticDeduplicationWorkflow

text_workflow = TextSemanticDeduplicationWorkflow(
    input_path="/path/to/input/data",
    output_path="/path/to/output",
    cache_path="/path/to/cache",
    text_field="text",
    n_clusters=100,
    eps=0.01,  # Similarity threshold
    perform_removal=True  # Complete deduplication
)
result = text_workflow.run()
# result.metadata contains: total_time, num_duplicates, num_duplicates_removed

Note: Two workflows available:

  • TextSemanticDeduplicationWorkflow: For raw text with automatic embedding generation
  • SemanticDeduplicationWorkflow: For pre-computed embeddings

See Semantic Deduplication for details.

Advanced: Step-by-Step Semantic Deduplication

For fine-grained control, break semantic deduplication into separate stages:

from nemo_curator.stages.deduplication.id_generator import create_id_generator_actor
from nemo_curator.stages.text.embedders.vllm import VLLMEmbeddingModelStage
from nemo_curator.stages.deduplication.semantic import SemanticDeduplicationWorkflow

# 1. Create ID generator
create_id_generator_actor()

# 2. Generate embeddings separately (using vLLM)
embedding_pipeline = Pipeline(
    stages=[
        ParquetReader(file_paths=input_path, _generate_ids=True),
        VLLMEmbeddingModelStage(
            model_identifier="google/embeddinggemma-300m",
            text_field="text",
            embedding_field="embeddings",
        ),
        ParquetWriter(path=embedding_output_path, fields=["_curator_dedup_id", "embeddings"])
    ]
)
embedding_out = embedding_pipeline.run()

# 3. Run clustering and pairwise similarity
semantic_workflow = SemanticDeduplicationWorkflow(
    input_path=embedding_output_path,
    output_path=semantic_workflow_path,
    n_clusters=100,
    id_field="_curator_dedup_id",
    embedding_field="embeddings",
    eps=None  # Skip duplicate identification for analysis
)
result = semantic_workflow.run()

# 4. Analyze results and choose eps parameter
# 5. Identify and remove duplicates

This approach enables analysis of intermediate results and fine-grained control.


Deduplication Methods

Choose a deduplication method based on your needs:

Common Operations

Document IDs

Duplicate removal workflows require stable document identifiers. Choose one approach:

  • Use AddId to add IDs at the start of your pipeline
  • Use reader-based ID generation (_generate_ids, _assign_ids) backed by the ID Generator actor for stable integer IDs
  • Use existing IDs if your documents already have unique identifiers

Some workflows write an ID generator state file (*_id_generator.json) for later removal when IDs are auto-assigned.

Removing Duplicates

Use TextDuplicatesRemovalWorkflow to apply duplicate IDs to your original dataset. Works with IDs from exact, fuzzy, or semantic deduplication.

from nemo_curator.stages.text.deduplication.removal_workflow import TextDuplicatesRemovalWorkflow

removal_workflow = TextDuplicatesRemovalWorkflow(
    input_path="/path/to/input",
    ids_to_remove_path="/path/to/duplicates",  # ExactDuplicateIds/, FuzzyDuplicateIds/, or duplicates/
    output_path="/path/to/clean",
    input_filetype="parquet",
    input_id_field="_curator_dedup_id",
    ids_to_remove_duplicate_id_field="_curator_dedup_id",
    id_generator_path="/path/to/id_generator.json"  # Required when IDs were auto-assigned
)
result = removal_workflow.run()
# result.metadata contains: total_time, num_duplicates_removed
ID Field Configuration

When assign_id=True (IDs auto-assigned):

  • Duplicate IDs file contains _curator_dedup_id column
  • Set ids_to_remove_duplicate_id_field="_curator_dedup_id"
  • id_generator_path is required

When assign_id=False (using existing IDs):

  • Duplicate IDs file contains the column specified by id_field (e.g., "id")
  • Set ids_to_remove_duplicate_id_field to match your id_field value
  • id_generator_path not required

Workflow Results

All deduplication workflows return a WorkflowRunResult object with timing and duplicate count metadata:

from nemo_curator.pipeline.workflow import WorkflowRunResult

result = exact_workflow.run()
print(result.metadata)  # {"total_time": 42.1, "num_duplicates": 1500, ...}

Available metadata varies by workflow. Common keys include total_time and num_duplicates.

Outputs and Artifacts

Each deduplication method produces specific output files and directories:

MethodDuplicate IDs LocationID Generator FileDeduplicated Output
ExactExactDuplicateIds/ (parquet)exact_id_generator.json (if assign_id=True)Via TextDuplicatesRemovalWorkflow
FuzzyFuzzyDuplicateIds/ (parquet)fuzzy_id_generator.json (if IDs auto-assigned)Via TextDuplicatesRemovalWorkflow
Semanticoutput_path/duplicates/ (parquet)N/Aoutput_path/deduplicated/ (if perform_removal=True)

Column names:

  • _curator_dedup_id when assign_id=True or IDs are auto-assigned
  • Matches id_field parameter when assign_id=False

Choosing a Deduplication Method

Compare deduplication methods to select the best approach for your dataset:

MethodBest ForSpeedDuplicate TypesGPU Required
ExactIdentical copiesVery fastCharacter-for-character matchesRequired
FuzzyNear-duplicates with small changesFastMinor edits, reformatting (~80% similarity)Required
SemanticSimilar meaning, different wordsModerateParaphrases, translations, rewritesRequired

Quick Decision Guide

Use this guide to quickly select the right method:

  • Start with Exact if you have numerous identical documents or need the fastest speed
  • Use Fuzzy if you need to catch near-duplicates with minor formatting differences
  • Use Semantic for meaning-based deduplication on large, diverse datasets
When to Use Each Method

Exact Deduplication:

  • Removing identical copies of documents
  • Fast initial deduplication pass
  • Datasets with numerous exact duplicates
  • When speed is more important than detecting near-duplicates

Fuzzy Deduplication:

  • Removing near-duplicate documents with minor formatting differences
  • Detecting documents with small edits or typos
  • Fast deduplication when exact matching misses numerous duplicates
  • When speed is important but some near-duplicate detection is needed

Semantic Deduplication:

  • Removing semantically similar content (paraphrases, translations)
  • Large, diverse web-scale datasets
  • When meaning-based deduplication is more important than speed
  • Advanced use cases requiring embedding-based similarity detection
Combining Methods

You can combine deduplication methods for comprehensive duplicate removal:

  1. Exact → Fuzzy → Semantic: Start with fastest methods, then apply more sophisticated methods
  2. Exact → Semantic: Use exact for quick wins, then semantic for meaning-based duplicates
  3. Fuzzy → Semantic: Use fuzzy for near-duplicates, then semantic for paraphrases

Run each method independently, then combine duplicate IDs before removal.

For detailed implementation guides, see:

Performance Considerations

GPU Acceleration

All deduplication workflows require GPU acceleration:

  • Exact: Ray backend with GPU support for MD5 hashing operations
  • Fuzzy: Ray backend with GPU support for MinHash computation and LSH operations
  • Semantic: GPU required for embedding generation (transformer models), K-means clustering, and pairwise similarity computation

GPU acceleration provides significant speedup for large datasets through parallel processing.

Hardware Requirements

  • GPU: Required for all workflows (Ray with GPU support for exact/fuzzy, GPU for semantic)
  • Memory: GPU memory requirements scale with dataset size, batch sizes, and embedding dimensions
  • Executors: Can use various executors (XennaExecutor, RayDataExecutor) with GPU support

Backend Setup

For optimal performance with large datasets, configure Ray backend:

from nemo_curator.core.client import RayClient

client = RayClient(
    num_cpus=64,    # Adjust based on available cores
    num_gpus=4      # Should be roughly 2x the memory of embeddings
)
client.start()

try:
    result = workflow.run()
finally:
    client.stop()

For TB-scale datasets, consider distributed GPU clusters with Ray.

ID Generator for Large-Scale Operations

For large-scale duplicate removal, persist the ID Generator for consistent document tracking:

from nemo_curator.stages.deduplication.id_generator import (
    create_id_generator_actor,
    write_id_generator_to_disk,
    kill_id_generator_actor
)

create_id_generator_actor()
id_generator_path = "semantic_id_generator.json"
write_id_generator_to_disk(id_generator_path)
kill_id_generator_actor()

# Use saved ID generator in removal workflow
removal_workflow = TextDuplicatesRemovalWorkflow(
    input_path=input_path,
    ids_to_remove_path=duplicates_path,
    output_path=output_path,
    id_generator_path=id_generator_path,
    # ... other parameters
)

The ID Generator ensures consistent IDs across workflow stages.

Next Steps

Ready to use deduplication?

For hands-on guidance: See Text Curation Tutorials for step-by-step examples.